Know event to present, to answer, to tell the reader also allow the reader to guess what the fate of the characters of this writing style preference could not see!
Meng,fake oakleys, in fact, been recently read the pressure in the heart, what people do not feel happy after reading today, I found, and the original key is Li Hong more and more like a puppet rather than a protagonist in the latest chapter , fully demonstrated that extremely typical.
Take a look at this chapter Li Hong doing? Meetings, writing letters, sleeping.,cheap oakley sunglasses, Li Hong has increasingly become the hands of counselors and court minister pawn in my opinion. Although not saying accurate, but Li Hong's no assertive said Gu Gu head tail, in the late Han Dynasty era would have died a dozen times, and we have seen, is really the history of this era of the late Han Dynasty, such as Li Hong survival? Please example I know fierce big've been thinking about how reasonable change history and change, however, the historical premise is to respect history ah we are seeing now, Lee Hong-doing?
About what In fact, this novel in history and then built on more and more successful, but in the artistic creation of the novel, increasingly fail I have been to one of my good friends Recommend this novel study history, his last and I said: before and after different person, the author is also the protagonist.
In fact, in the fierce large number of recent message, I also found a problem, you are always concerned about the whole trend in thinking about the imperial power constraints. However, why you can not spend more point pen and ink to go more the performance of a certain important plot That better performance storytelling? whole historical process is certainly important, but some of the minutiae is absolutely no need to go about each chapter I know the the Tahan situation: two battlefield with two centers: wing state and Yuzhou, of Jinyang with Luoyang So in the end focus where? fierce big feel short soldiers to meet the increasingly fierce two battlefields, or debating, the two centers clueless? I really do not know which more important? Which is more too should be more detailed description? which more literary creation of the space?
A the supporting role heartfelt language dialogue, just some old stuff Wong EC dispute; blooded passion War Description, some just a few words simple band; thrilling strategy conquest, only clown -sounding; the righteous protagonist shaping only increasingly weak puppet protagonist.
Description of the multi-angle, I have no objection, but did not focus, did not taste the creation, I feel sad. Fierce uppercase In fact, in the first book, I think it is best, and why? Line of the book has been in Li Hong body, but I do not feel that I lost control of the overall situation and feelings, but opposite line of the book
No comments:
Post a Comment